|
Russian Perspectives
on European Security at the turn of the Century
Professor Grigori Sergeevich Khozin from
the Department of Foreign Policy and
International Relations, Russian Diplomatic Academy spoke
to an invited audience at the Delhi Policy Group on January
2, 2001.
Speaking on the
`Russian Perspectives on European Security at the turn of
the century' Professor Khozin said that from medieval times
Europe had been a source of danger for Russia. This makes
the country anxious and it over reacts in its relations with
the rest of the continent. The post world war period was one
of the benchmarks in Russian foreign policy that led to a
new wave of confrontation with Europe. Though Russia had emerged
a winner from the war it was totally exhausted and had to
double its efforts to remain a super power. It had to not
only search allies to balance the power equation with the
western world but also to concentrate on military power with
the assumption that a militarily strong country would be a
politically strong one too. One of the important lessons learnt
from the experience was that more arms build up between the
two ideologically distinct camps of the democrats and communists
enhanced psychological threats from each other. The second
important benchmark in the Russian history is the Helsinki
Accord of 1975 that emphasized on socio- economic factors
instead of just military affairs.
The dramatic socio-political
changes experienced in Soviet Union and Europe in 1990s led
to rethinking on security perceptions. Russia, after the disintegration
of the Soviet Union was looking for a place in the world order
but was also going through policy dilemmas ranging from the
policy of rejecting the communist past to one of maintaining
the status quo. Russia had to reassess itself and its policies.
It tried to change its own policies to suit its internal and
external security concerns. One of the positive changes from
the past was transparency in the policy not only to the world
but also to its own people. The non-military aspect of security
viz. political, economic, humanitarian, environmental etc
have become the new thrust areas in the Russian policy pronouncements.
In the same context Prof. Khozin said that in Russian thinking
NATO as a military alliance has lost its relevance. The European
Union is more contemporary in its approach with its emphasis
on economic security. However Russia will remain with the
Organisation and Security for Cooperation in Europe because
of its holistic perspective on security. These directions
in the Russian policy were due to the existing reality of
the country no longer being a super power. The speaker said
that a country's aspirations have to be met by its economic
and military capabilities and without it Russia had to tailor
its ambitions as a power. The US under the Bush administration
will try to project the Russian threat to keep the rationale
for military weapons. However, on receiving no counter reaction
from Russia to build its military strength, America will have
to again rethink its policies on Russia. Russia would in the
future view Europe as a potential partner in security affairs.
|